Freakonomics
5.0
9 min

Freakonomics

by Steven D. Levitt, Stephen J. Dubner

Brief Summary

“Freakonomics” by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner explains the intricacies of human incentives, which stimulate us to work, do good things, and get what we want. Using historical examples, the authors also explore how economics can shed light on different phenomena.

Key points

Listen first key point
00:00

Key idea 1 of 7

Incentives play a big role in our lives. It is what makes people do more good deeds and less bad deeds. There are positive and negative incentives, so-called *disincentives,* and we learn to react to both types from childhood. Remember how it instantly hurt when you touched hot water? Or how you felt when you received the phone of your dreams for a successful semester at school? These are all examples of incentives and how they motivate us to do certain things.

We can distinguish three types of incentives: social, moral, and economic. Moreover, the same situation can contain three types of incentives at once. For instance, what keeps us from committing theft? First, we can lose property, money, and jobs. All these things can be attributed to economic incentives. Secondly, it is disappointing to others, like our relatives, colleagues, and friends, which is a social incentive. Lastly, our conscience steers us away from crime and prevents us from illegally taking the property of others. Moral incentives play the leading role here.

Let's consider another story about kindergartens in the Israeli city of Haifa. Some daycare centers there had a strict policy: parents must pick up their children by 4 p.m. However, many parents ignored this rule, so two economists conducted a small experiment, setting a fine of $3 for being late. For the first four weeks, they simply collected information and statistics on lateness, and in the fifth week, they began to issue fines.

However, a new problem arose: this fine replaced the parents' moral disincentive with an economic one. Parents stopped feeling guilty for their tardiness because they knew they could easily pay off 3 dollars. Later, even more parents followed suit. Of course, if the fine were $100, such a situation would not have arisen because such a hefty amount could deter parents from being late.

01
Incentives motivate us to do more good deeds and less bad ones
02
Experts usually act in their own interests, not yours
03
Conventional wisdom is more convenient but not always true
04
Finding cause-and-effect relationships makes our lives easier
05
We look for proximate causes rather than delve into the facts
06
Naming traditions in black and white families can impact children’s lives
07
Final Summary

You may also like these summaries

Mobile App Screenshots

Find full Audio & text of your favorite books in the AdvanceMe app!

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur.

Start your free trial